SHARE:

Submit to FacebookSubmit to TwitterqSubmit to LinkedIn

Other-edButton  bandeau-new-June2017 cover big April FINAL cover big March3 cover big February-2017 cover big January-final- cover big December FINAL cover big November FINAL cover big October-FINAL cover big September-16-big cover big June 2016 cover big May-FINAL cover big Aprilv7 cover big February02 cover big January2016 cover november2015 grande cover october2015 grande cover big Sept good cover-old July small cover-old June small cover-old June cover-old APRIL cover-old MARCH cover-old feb cover-old cover-old cover oct2014 bandeauhome-sept cover July2 other small coverJune cover-new-May-2014 cover-new-April-2014 cover-new-march-2014 cover feb14  cover-january-2014   
Issue 05 / May 2017 Issue 04/ April 2017 Issue 03/ March 2017 Issue 02/ February 2017 Issue 01 / January 2017 Issue 09 / November 2016 Issue 08 / October 2016 Issue 07 / September 2016 Issue 06 / July/August 2016 Issue 05 / June 2016 Issue 04 / April 2016 Issue 03 / March 2016 Issue 02 / February 2016 Issue 01 / January 2016 Issue 10 / November 2015 Issue 09 / October 2015 Issue 08 / September 2015 Issue 07 / July-August 2015 Issue 06 / June 2015 Issue 05 / May 2015 Issue 04 / April 2015 Issue 03 / March 2015 Issue 02 / February 2015 Issue 01 / January 2015 Issue 10 / November 2014 Issue 09 / October 2014 Issue 08 / September 2014 Issue 07 / July/August 2014 Issue 06 / June 2014 Issue 05 / May 2014 Issue 04 / April 2014 Issue 03 / March 2014  Issue 02 / February 2014 Issue 01 / January 2014
11  UNEP ON THE GROUND
Is time up for nuclear?

Experts have helped understand the implications of backing or rejecting a proposal to bring forward the date for switching nuclear power off in Switzerland during a Geneva Environment Network (GEN) event.


Last month, Swiss voters went to the polls to vote on a popular initiative tabled by the country’s Greens party would have closed all power plants that are 45 years old and above. Among other changes, the move would have shut down three of the five plants in operation almost immediately and banned the construction of new ones.


Ahead of the referendum, GEN gathered experts from the International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) and UN Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE) on 22 November to provide in-depth technical background on what’s at stake in the vote and set it in an international context.


During the discussion, the potential risks stemming from old nuclear plants, alternatives to the technology, incentives for switching to renewables, the effect on C02 emissions as well as the cost of nuclear and the ways waste is explored was explained in detail.


Switzerland has less solar and wind energy than most of Europe, yet is highly interconnected, offering an opportunity to shift to renewables, noted Richard Bridle - Project Researcher at the IISD’s Global Subsidies Initiative.


A question mark exists however over whether Switzerland wishes to pay for the early closure of nuclear, noted Scott Foster, Director of UNECE’s Sustainable Energy Division. Looking to the future, energy needs to be traded more freely in any case, while energy efficiency can be greatly improved - including by setting a price on carbon above 100 euros per ton, he underlined.


Meanwhile, the risk of a nuclear accident is very small, but the consequences of one would be enormous, noted Peter Wooders, the IISD’s Group Director on Energy. Therefore, “the potential risk from old power plants remains a question of trust in the safety authorities,” he believes. The question in the referendum is whether Switzerland needs a quick-start to shift to renewables, summarised Nathalie Bernasconi-Osterwalder, Head of Economic Law and Policy at the IISD, moderating the discussion.


In the vote held the following weekend, nearly 55% of Swiss rejected the proposal compared to 45% in favour, meaning the government’s original phase-out plan remains in place. The plan foresees all five nuclear plants in Switzerland being decommissioned at the end of their natural lives – around the year 2050.


To read a full report on the GEN discussion please click here. For more information on the event please contact diana.rizzolio@unep.org

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 This site is best viewed in Google Chrome
Copyright © United Nations Environment Programme.
Privacy  I  Terms and Conditions